SPEC Kit 337: Print Retention Decision Making · 39
24. Did you library consider whether the items were available in other print repositories (e.g.,
consortium holdings, ReCAP, Western Regional Storage Trust, etc.) when selecting them for
inclusion in the remote shelving facility? N=44
Yes 16 36%
No 28 64%
If yes, please identify the print repository. N=15
ASERL Cooperative Journal Retention agreement, Information Alliance Consortium, CRL
ASERL Print Journal Retention Program
Availability in SRLF has been a criterion for on-going selection for local storage.
CIC print repository, CRL collection, and availability from other nearby research library collections.
CIC SPR
CRL and other print repositories listed in CRL’s PAPR database.
CRL, WEST, CIC
Shared Ohio facilities
Sometimes. Depends upon subject specialist.
We generally check to see how many other copies are available in OhioLINK but do not worry about whether the copies
are in campus libraries or in remote storage.
WEST, local shared repository
Western Regional Storage Trust (WEST) (3 response)
WEST, CRL
25. Did your library consider whether the items were available in electronic format or in an electronic
repository when selecting them for inclusion in the remote shelving facility? N=45
Yes 39 87%
No 6 13%
If yes, please indicate which electronic format or repository is considered. Check all that apply.
N=39
Purchased e-format 37 95%
Licensed e-format 23 59%
HathiTrust 17 44%
Portico 16 41%
LOCKSS 6 15%
CLOCKSS 5 13%
Other e-format or repository 2 5%
Previous Page Next Page