SPEC Kit 329: Managing Born-Digital Special Collections and Archival Materials (August 2012)
Page11(11 of 202)
SPEC Kit 329: Managing Born-Digital Special Collections and Archival Materials · 11 Executive Summary Introduction The 2010 OCLC Research report, Taking Our Pulse, list- ed management of born-digital materials as the third biggest challenge facing libraries, special collections, and archives, after space and facilities. It has become a truism that the trickle of born-digital materials into special collections has become a flood. Increasingly, these materials do not have analog counterparts. Libraries and archives can no longer defer decisions about digital content to a later date. We must develop policies and procedures to operationalize the manage- ment of born-digital materials, or we risk losing the record of the recent past. This survey sought to gather and promote emerg- ing good practices for managing born-digital content and to highlight common challenges. The survey in- strument focused in particular on staffing, ingest and processing workflows, storage procedures, and access and discovery methods. Sixty-four of the 126 ARL member libraries responded to the survey between February 22 and March 23 for a response rate of 51%. Fifty-nine of the respondents (92%) already collect born-digital content. The remaining five libraries are in the planning stages. The level of engagement with born-digital content was higher than anticipated by the survey team. An analysis of the responding librar- ies engaged with born-digital materials revealed they are larger institutions and therefore more likely to be pioneers in working with this content. The management of born-digital materials is still relatively new for ARL libraries, and the survey re- sults show that good practices and workflows are still evolving. New tools are emerging rapidly, and the once-solid line between digitized content and born-digital content is beginning to blur. Survey re- sponses indicated that the library and archives pro- fession lacks a common definition of what born-dig- ital content is and a common understanding of who within the organization should manage this content. Staffing and Organization The survey asked how many library staff collect and manage born-digital materials, who has responsibility for storage-related activities, how staffing needs are addressed, and how staff gain the expertise required to manage these materials. No one staffing or organi- zational structure emerged from the survey responses, which again reflects the evolutionary status of born- digital management programs. The number of staff working with born-digital archival content in the responding libraries ranges from less than one to 60 FTE. While archivists and librarians in institutional and government archives were the trailblazers in collecting this content, man- aging these materials now requires staff from digi- tization, digital curation, information technology, and institutional repository units. Respondents most frequently mentioned special collections/archives staff and library IT staff as having decision-making responsibility for selecting storage solutions, imple- menting and maintaining infrastructure, managing user authentication, estimating storage needs and monitoring usage, and budgeting. Many other units are also involved, including institutional IT, preserva- tion, collections, administration, and consortia in a wide variety of combinations. This organizational distribution may factor into how respondents have addressed staffing needs for