146 · Representative Documents: Performance Assessment
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Purdue University Libraries Faculty Performance Review
1
Purdue University Libraries Faculty Performance Review
Name of Faculty Member_____________________________________________________________________________
Rank______________________________________________________________________________________________
Members of Faculty Review Committee:
Supervisor___________________________________________________________________________________
Full Professor________________________________________________________________________________
Mentor_____________________________________________________________________________________
This Performance Review includes:
_____Supervisor’s Narrative (required)
_____Comments—Full Professor (optional)
_____Comments—Mentor (optional)
The Faculty Performance Rating (last page) is to be assigned by the Supervisor and shared only with the Faculty
Member.
In addition to an overall performance rating, specific feedback will be given for the three main areas evaluated
in the promotion and tenure process, Learning, Discovery, and Engagement. It is not expected that faculty
members will make equal contributions in Learning, Discovery and Engagement each year, but progress should
be commensurate with the priorities and goals agreed to by supervisor and faculty member. The overall
performance rating of the faculty member will take into consideration the different areas of performance,
commitment to new roles of faculty, and commitment to organizational citizenship (e.g. communication,
accountability, problem solving and judgment, change management, professional development, teamwork and
collaboration).
I. Learning (Librarianship)
Each faculty member must demonstrate excellence in their assigned areas of responsibility. Activities in those
areas of responsibility should contribute to the learning mission of the University. The scholarship of learning
should be included in this section and evaluated for quality, quantity, significance and relevance to Library and
Information Science.
Summarize performance in assigned areas of responsibility, addressing quality, productivity, and effectiveness.
Especially, indicate special opportunities or accomplishments that contributed to the furthering of the
Libraries’ and University’s strategic plans.
Indicate areas recommended for continued excellence or improvement and relevant annual goals met or
unmet by the faculty member.
Previous Page Next Page