SPEC Kit 344: Talent Management (November 2014)
Page123(123 of 184)
SPEC Kit 344: Talent Management · 123 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Libraries’ Faculty Performance Evaluation http://www.libs.uga.edu/staff/libfacultyperfevalform.doc 4 Completed by the Supervisor Supervisory assessment of overall job performance during the last performance cycle is described and rated below. All portions of the performance evaluation are considered and weighed in summarizing performance. In addition to general comments on performance strengths and areas that need improvement, the supervisor should include comments regarding potential for promotion and progress toward the goals set during the last performance evaluation. The overall evaluation rating will determine the merit level. Consistently exceeds expectations in all areas of performance or, exceeds expectations in Most areas with an outstanding additional contribution. Exceeds expectations in most areas. Meets expectations. Overall job performance does not meet expectations and indicates a need for improvement. Overall job performance is unsatisfactory. Supporting Supervisory Comments: Section V – Signatures Completed by the Libraries’ Faculty member: 1. I was given the opportunity to review and discuss my job description, and to review and discuss the work standards to be rated during the next performance review cycle. Yes No 2. Comments on this performance evaluation (optional): Supervisor Signature Date: Employee Signature Date: (Signature acknowledges receipt not necessarily agreement.) Department Head Signature (if different than supervisor): Date: Last Revision to Form: 2001 2006