Scholarly Communication Education Initiatives · 65
Delivery method Audience Content Most Effective Activity
Presentation Senate Library
Committee
SC A presentation to Senate Library Committee raised awareness
of the issues and also informed the SC Committee about
reservations the faculty have about alternative models of
scholarly communications.
Presentation Faculty senate Copyright
addendum
Librarians delivered multiple, progressive presentations to
governance bodies (e.g., Faculty Senate), culminating in their
endorsement of the CIC Author Addendum.
Presentation, road
show
Faculty SC Educating, at first, a small group of interested librarians and
staff, and presenting informal ‘road shows’ to the university
community.
Provost Faculty Open access
publication
fees
Developing initiative cosponsored by Vice Provost for Research to
fund open access publication fees.
Resolution Faculty Senate
resolution on
SC
Faculty Senate resolution in support of the budget increase for
library acquisitions.
Resolution Faculty Senate
resolution on
SC
Faculty Senate resolution.
Resolution Faculty Senate Author
Addendum
Two resolutions have been drawn up. The first, passed by the
faculty senate in February 2004, was a Resolution on Scholarly
Communication, which states that “faculty, staff, students, and
university administrators must all take greater responsibility for
their scholarly communication system.” The second, proposed by
the libraries’ Scholarly Communications Team, asks for university
scholars to use authors’ amendments to retain copyright and
to deposit digital versions of scholarship in the institutional
repository.
Resolution Faculty Senate SC Two resolutions have been drawn up. The first, passed by the
faculty senate in February 2004, was a Resolution on Scholarly
Communication, which states that “faculty, staff, students, and
university administrators must all take greater responsibility for
their scholarly communication system.” The second, proposed by
the libraries’ Scholarly Communications Team, asks for university
scholars to use authors’ amendments to retain copyright and
to deposit digital versions of scholarship in the institutional
repository.
Delivery method Audience Content Most Effective Activity
Presentation Senate Library
Committee
SC A presentation to Senate Library Committee raised awareness
of the issues and also informed the SC Committee about
reservations the faculty have about alternative models of
scholarly communications.
Presentation Faculty senate Copyright
addendum
Librarians delivered multiple, progressive presentations to
governance bodies (e.g., Faculty Senate), culminating in their
endorsement of the CIC Author Addendum.
Presentation, road
show
Faculty SC Educating, at first, a small group of interested librarians and
staff, and presenting informal ‘road shows’ to the university
community.
Provost Faculty Open access
publication
fees
Developing initiative cosponsored by Vice Provost for Research to
fund open access publication fees.
Resolution Faculty Senate
resolution on
SC
Faculty Senate resolution in support of the budget increase for
library acquisitions.
Resolution Faculty Senate
resolution on
SC
Faculty Senate resolution.
Resolution Faculty Senate Author
Addendum
Two resolutions have been drawn up. The first, passed by the
faculty senate in February 2004, was a Resolution on Scholarly
Communication, which states that “faculty, staff, students, and
university administrators must all take greater responsibility for
their scholarly communication system.” The second, proposed by
the libraries’ Scholarly Communications Team, asks for university
scholars to use authors’ amendments to retain copyright and
to deposit digital versions of scholarship in the institutional
repository.
Resolution Faculty Senate SC Two resolutions have been drawn up. The first, passed by the
faculty senate in February 2004, was a Resolution on Scholarly
Communication, which states that “faculty, staff, students, and
university administrators must all take greater responsibility for
their scholarly communication system.” The second, proposed by
the libraries’ Scholarly Communications Team, asks for university
scholars to use authors’ amendments to retain copyright and
to deposit digital versions of scholarship in the institutional
repository.
