42 · SPEC Kit 299
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for non-faculty researchers?
Rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective. Check
“Not used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=13
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
Formal group presentations 13 1
(8%)
— 5
(38%)
2
(15%)
4
(31%)
1
(8%)
One-on-one conversations 13 — — 2
(15%)
3
(23%)
8
(62%)
—
Web pages 13 2
(15%)
1
(8%)
6
(46%)
3
(23%)
— 1
(8%)
Brochures and other documents 13 1
(8%)
1
(8%)
7
(54%)
2
(15%)
1
(8%)
1
(8%)
E-mail messages 13 2
(15%)
— 4
(31%)
3
(23%)
— 4
(31%)
Informal group discussions 12 — — 3
(25%)
5
(42%)
4
(33%)
—
Newsletter articles 12 1
(8%)
1
(8%)
4
(33%)
3
(25%)
— 3
(25%)
Other method 3 — — 1
(33%)
— — 2
(67%)
Please describe other delivery method. N=2
“Podcasts.”
“Scholarly Communication Blog, E-Publishing Symposium.”
Additional Comments N=3
“Although we have no particular plans to approach non-faculty researchers at the moment, we may well do so
in the future.”
“We have included them in programs where there is interest and we have room though our priority target has
been ladder faculty.”
“We hope to discuss the entire range of issues in a systematic manner in the coming year—this would be for
all researchers and scholars. We have never made a distinction between faculty and other types of researchers.
Our focus does center on rights retention though we do discuss all of the above as circumstances permit.”
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for non-faculty researchers?
Rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective. Check
“Not used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=13
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
Formal group presentations 13 1
(8%)
— 5
(38%)
2
(15%)
4
(31%)
1
(8%)
One-on-one conversations 13 — — 2
(15%)
3
(23%)
8
(62%)
—
Web pages 13 2
(15%)
1
(8%)
6
(46%)
3
(23%)
— 1
(8%)
Brochures and other documents 13 1
(8%)
1
(8%)
7
(54%)
2
(15%)
1
(8%)
1
(8%)
E-mail messages 13 2
(15%)
— 4
(31%)
3
(23%)
— 4
(31%)
Informal group discussions 12 — — 3
(25%)
5
(42%)
4
(33%)
—
Newsletter articles 12 1
(8%)
1
(8%)
4
(33%)
3
(25%)
— 3
(25%)
Other method 3 — — 1
(33%)
— — 2
(67%)
Please describe other delivery method. N=2
“Podcasts.”
“Scholarly Communication Blog, E-Publishing Symposium.”
Additional Comments N=3
“Although we have no particular plans to approach non-faculty researchers at the moment, we may well do so
in the future.”
“We have included them in programs where there is interest and we have room though our priority target has
been ladder faculty.”
“We hope to discuss the entire range of issues in a systematic manner in the coming year—this would be for
all researchers and scholars. We have never made a distinction between faculty and other types of researchers.
Our focus does center on rights retention though we do discuss all of the above as circumstances permit.”
