Scholarly Communication Education Initiatives · 55
Future of the scholarly monograph 47 32
(68)
4
(9%)
11
(23%)
Disciplinary differences in communication practices 46 31
(67%)
4
(9%)
11
(24%)
Editor activism (e.g., working within scholarly societies to improve open access to
articles)
45 25
(56%)
5
(11%)
15
(33%)
Other topic 10 3
(30%)
1
(10%)
6
(60%)
Please describe other topic(s). N=3
“Benefits of institutional repositories.”
“Changes and developments in copyright law.”
“Copyright.”
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for librarians and other library
staff? Rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective.
Check “Not used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=50
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
Informal group discussions 50 4
(8%)
1
(2%)
15
(30%)
13
(26%)
12
(24%)
5
(10%)
Formal group presentations 49 2
(4%)
1
(2%)
12
(24%)
17
(35%)
14
(29%)
3
(6%)
One-on-one conversations 48 2
(4%)
1
(2%)
13
(27%)
13
(27%)
16
(33%)
3
(6%)
Web pages 48 2
(4%)
4
(8%)
22
(46%)
7
(15%)
4
(8%)
9
(19%)
Brochures and other documents 47 3
(6%)
4
(9%)
14
(30%)
11
(23%)
5
(11%)
10
(21%)
Newsletter articles 47 1
(2%)
13
(28%)
11
(23%)
5
(11%)
3
(6%)
14
(30%)
E-mail messages 47 1
(2%)
7
(15%)
20
(43%)
5
(11%)
5
(11%)
9
(19%)
Other method 13 1
(8%)
1
(8%)
1
(8%)
10
(77%)
Previous Page Next Page