58 · SPEC Kit 299
Contributing to digital repositories 6 67%
National/international public access developments such as
Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006, NIH policy, etc. 5 56%
Editor activism (e.g., working within scholarly societies to
Improve open access to articles) 4 44%
Future of the scholarly monograph 4 44%
Disciplinary differences in communication practices 4 44%
Other topic (please specify) 0 —
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for this other audience? Rate
the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective. Check “Not
used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=8
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
Formal group presentations 8 — — — 2
(25%)
4
(50%)
2
(25%)
One-on-one conversations 7 — — 1
(14%)
2
(29%)
2
(29%)
2
(29%)
Informal group discussions 6 — — — 1
(17%)
2
(33%)
3
(50%)
Web pages 6 — — 3
(50%)
— 1
(17%)
2
(33%)
Brochures and other documents 6 — — 2
(33%)
1
(17%)
— 3
(50%)
Newsletter articles 6 — 1
(17%)
1
(17%)
— — 4
(67%)
E-mail messages 6 — — 1
(17%)
2
(33%)
— 3
(50%)
Other method 1 — — — — — 1
(100%)
Please describe other delivery method. N=1
“Survey not sent, yet, but will be sent by mail.”