46 · SPEC Kit 299
“Impact and opportunities of information technology on scholarly research and dissemination.”
“Importance of campus-wide copyright policy and guidelines.”
“Importance of making it easy for faculty to determine who holds copyright to their research. Importance of
university for retaining its intellectual property.”
“Prestige and grant-application value of IR.”
“University Librarian made presentations at Deans’ meetings on: Create Change Campaign, Open Access.”
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for institution administrators?
Rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective. Check
“Not used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=40
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
One-on-one conversations 40 1
(3%)
— 5
(13%)
8
(20%)
24
(60%)
2
(5%)
Formal group presentations 39 3
(8%)
1
(3%)
9
(23%)
10
(26%)
7
(18%)
9
(23%)
Informal group discussions 38 1
(3%)
1
(3%)
7
(18%)
11
(29%)
10
(26%)
8
(21%)
Brochures and other documents 36 2
(6%)
8
(22%)
7
(19%)
4
(11%)
3
(8%)
12
(33%)
Newsletter articles 36 5
(14%)
4
(11%)
4
(11%)
6
(17%)
— 17
(47%)
E-mail messages 36 2
(6%)
9
(25%)
8
(22%)
5
(14%)
1
(3%)
11
(31%)
Web pages 34 6
(18%)
2
(6%)
7
(21%)
4
(12%)
— 15
(44%)
Other method 12 — — — — 1
(8%)
11
(92%)
Please describe other delivery method. N=2
“Reviewing click through statements for ETD, IR, course reserves and other IP related policies. Creation of
university-wide task forces on IP. Informal discussions with food.”
“Scholarly Communication Blog, E-Publishing Symposium.”
“Impact and opportunities of information technology on scholarly research and dissemination.”
“Importance of campus-wide copyright policy and guidelines.”
“Importance of making it easy for faculty to determine who holds copyright to their research. Importance of
university for retaining its intellectual property.”
“Prestige and grant-application value of IR.”
“University Librarian made presentations at Deans’ meetings on: Create Change Campaign, Open Access.”
What methods of delivering this content have been most effective for institution administrators?
Rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is least effective and 5 is most effective. Check
“Not used” if the library has not used a particular method. N=40
N 1 2 3 4 5 Not used
One-on-one conversations 40 1
(3%)
— 5
(13%)
8
(20%)
24
(60%)
2
(5%)
Formal group presentations 39 3
(8%)
1
(3%)
9
(23%)
10
(26%)
7
(18%)
9
(23%)
Informal group discussions 38 1
(3%)
1
(3%)
7
(18%)
11
(29%)
10
(26%)
8
(21%)
Brochures and other documents 36 2
(6%)
8
(22%)
7
(19%)
4
(11%)
3
(8%)
12
(33%)
Newsletter articles 36 5
(14%)
4
(11%)
4
(11%)
6
(17%)
— 17
(47%)
E-mail messages 36 2
(6%)
9
(25%)
8
(22%)
5
(14%)
1
(3%)
11
(31%)
Web pages 34 6
(18%)
2
(6%)
7
(21%)
4
(12%)
— 15
(44%)
Other method 12 — — — — 1
(8%)
11
(92%)
Please describe other delivery method. N=2
“Reviewing click through statements for ETD, IR, course reserves and other IP related policies. Creation of
university-wide task forces on IP. Informal discussions with food.”
“Scholarly Communication Blog, E-Publishing Symposium.”
