Libraries, Presses, and Publishing, SPEC Kit 357

Taylor, Laurie N.; Keith, Brian W; Dinsmore, Chelsea; Morris-Babb, Meredith

124 Representative Documents: Information for Authors and Editors
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES
Why Publish with Us?
http://library.pitt.edu/why-publish-us

Previous Page Next Page

SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing (November 2017) resources

Free Attachments

Follow Link Libraries-Presses-Publishing-SPEC-Kit-357.pdf

Extracted Text (may have errors)

124 Representative Documents: Information for Authors and Editors
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES
Why Publish with Us?
http://library.pitt.edu/why-publish-us

Help

123 SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES
Why Publish with Us?
http://library.pitt.edu/why-publish-us

Previous Page Next Page

SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing (November 2017) resources

125 SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES
Journal Proposal Form
http://library.pitt.edu/other/files/word/Journal_Proposal_Form.docx
Journal Proposal Form
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Please insert date of application
1) Title of journal
2) Frequency and schedule of publication:
A common publication model is to compile articles into issues prepared in advance and published
at one time on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. Journals also have the option of a
rolling publication (publish-as-you-go model) where the journal opens a volume and adds articles
one at a time as they become ready for publication.
3) Scope, focus, and description of content
4) Target audience
5) Types of content included (essays, research papers, book reviews, etc.)
6) Scholarly review.
For each type of content listed in 5) above, describe the intended review process.
• Address whether the content is peer reviewed, and if so, what process is followed to ensure
impartiality (single blind, double blind review, etc.).
• Number of reviewers per article
• Guidelines for reviewers including rubric for evaluation if available
• Standards, criteria, and process for selecting reviewers
• Process for acceptance decisions
7) Proposed editorial personnel
a) Editor(s) in chief
Identify the individual(s) responsible for academic content and executive management of the
publication, including name, title, organizational affiliation, and past experience in scholarly
publishing. Attach a CV for each editor or coeditor in chief.
b) Other editors, if any
Identify the individual(s) involved in day-to-day management of the publication, including
conducting reviews, assignment of copyediting, proofreading, layout, communication with
authors, etc. For each editor, provide name, title, organizational affiliation, and past
experience in scholarly publishing.

Previous Page Next Page

Page 1Survey Results click to expand contents

Page 63Representative Documents click to expand contents

Page 64Library Publishing Options click to expand contents

Page 94Staffing click to expand contents

Page 110Information for Authors and Editors click to expand contents

Page 134Publication Lists click to expand contents

Page 168Selected Resources click to expand contents

SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing (November 2017) resources

All section downloads (PDF) click to expand contents

Free Attachments

Extracted Text (may have errors)

Help

loading

SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing (November 2017) resources

SPEC Kit 357: Libraries, Presses, and Publishing (November 2017) resources