SPEC Kit 325: Digital Preservation  · 53
22. How satisfied is the library with the strategies currently used? Check all that apply. N=39
Satisfaction scale: Very Satisfied (no complaints), Mostly Satisfied (infrequent problems, yet no major complaints),
Neutral (working fine, but open to alternatives), Mostly Unsatisfied (major recurring problems, looking seriously at
alternatives), Very Unsatisfied (ready to change strategies immediately).
N Very
Satisfied
Mostly
Satisfied
Neutral Mostly
Unsatisfied
Very
Unsatisfied
Using a library-managed digital archive/
repository (such as DAITSS, Archivematica,
iRODS, etc.)
20 5 9 6 1
Collaborating with other administrative
and/or technical units in the institution
10 2 3 5 1
Using a vendor-based, hosted solution
(Portico, etc.)
10 2 5 3 1
Participating a collaborative, hosted
solution (HathiTrust, etc.)
9 1 5 4
Participating in a collaborative, participatory
solution (MetaArchive, etc.)
8 4 2 3
Other strategy 8 2 2 3 2
Number of Responses 38 10 20 11 4 0
23. What strategies do you anticipate the library will be using three years from now to ensure the
preservation of this type of asset? Check all that apply. N=40
Using a library-managed digital archive/repository
(such as DAITSS, Archivematica, iRODS, etc.) 25 63%
Collaborating with other administrative and/or technical units in the institution 13 33%
Participating in a collaborative, participatory solution (MetaArchive, etc.) 13 33%
Participating a collaborative, hosted solution (HathiTrust, etc.) 12 30%
Using a vendor-based, hosted solution (Portico, etc.) 11 28%
Other strategy 7 18%
Please describe the other strategy.
Currently, we are organizing and backing up digital assets in-house with no managed repository aimed at DP in use yet.
We’re in the investigative stage at this time.
Cloud storage (DuraCloud?)
Previous Page Next Page