82 · Survey Results: Survey Questions and Responses
18. For prospective agreements, what is the annual expenditure on new acquisitions? N=2
[NOTE: Only one respondent indicated budget-supported plans to acquire new content for a shared print program
prospectively, possibly indicating that existing programs are currently more focused on collaboratively storing and
maintaining legacy collections and new acquisitions purchased individually or alongside the shared print collaboration.]
$3,359,974 ($19,974 in direct expenditures plus $3.34 million that represents “value”, not direct financial expenditure.
UC libraries receive free shared print books and journal issues as part of some of its license agreements with publishers
for prospective publications.)
Assuming the 3-year pilot is successful with the initial legacy collection, we will establish the annual budget for
prospective acquisitions in 2016.
19. Please indicate who pays for the following functions. Check all that apply. N=20
Functions Supplying
Library
Shared Print
Program
Hosting
Library
User Other N
Project management 1 15 1 0 4 19
Records work 9 9 6 0 3 19
ILL fulfillment of returnable items 7 3 4 1 4 17
Multi-institutional collection analysis 4 10 1 0 5 16
ILL fulfillment of digital surrogates 5 3 4 0 4 15
Promotion and awareness 4 13 2 0 1 15
Systematic digitization (not for resource sharing) 2 0 2 0 2 6
Total Responses 12 15 7 1 8 20
If you selected “Other” above, please specify the function and identify the entity. N=8
All funding comes from the participating libraries but is handled through the WRLC budget.
Borrowing libraries typically pay for ILL.
Borrowing library pays for ILL fulfillment.
Collection analysis and project management are supplied by the OhioLINK consortium office.
Consortium staff is the project manager.
Costs of entire Collaborative Print Retention Program are covered by dues paid by TRLN member institutions.
No activity for these items [collection analysis, ILL, digitization].
Other includes the central service bureau—Florida Virtual Campus—that maintains MANGO and the individual ILS for
each state university.
18. For prospective agreements, what is the annual expenditure on new acquisitions? N=2
[NOTE: Only one respondent indicated budget-supported plans to acquire new content for a shared print program
prospectively, possibly indicating that existing programs are currently more focused on collaboratively storing and
maintaining legacy collections and new acquisitions purchased individually or alongside the shared print collaboration.]
$3,359,974 ($19,974 in direct expenditures plus $3.34 million that represents “value”, not direct financial expenditure.
UC libraries receive free shared print books and journal issues as part of some of its license agreements with publishers
for prospective publications.)
Assuming the 3-year pilot is successful with the initial legacy collection, we will establish the annual budget for
prospective acquisitions in 2016.
19. Please indicate who pays for the following functions. Check all that apply. N=20
Functions Supplying
Library
Shared Print
Program
Hosting
Library
User Other N
Project management 1 15 1 0 4 19
Records work 9 9 6 0 3 19
ILL fulfillment of returnable items 7 3 4 1 4 17
Multi-institutional collection analysis 4 10 1 0 5 16
ILL fulfillment of digital surrogates 5 3 4 0 4 15
Promotion and awareness 4 13 2 0 1 15
Systematic digitization (not for resource sharing) 2 0 2 0 2 6
Total Responses 12 15 7 1 8 20
If you selected “Other” above, please specify the function and identify the entity. N=8
All funding comes from the participating libraries but is handled through the WRLC budget.
Borrowing libraries typically pay for ILL.
Borrowing library pays for ILL fulfillment.
Collection analysis and project management are supplied by the OhioLINK consortium office.
Consortium staff is the project manager.
Costs of entire Collaborative Print Retention Program are covered by dues paid by TRLN member institutions.
No activity for these items [collection analysis, ILL, digitization].
Other includes the central service bureau—Florida Virtual Campus—that maintains MANGO and the individual ILS for
each state university.
