24 · Survey Results: Executive Summary
References
Adamick, Jessica, and Rebecca Reznik-Zellen.
2010. “Representation and Recognition of Subject
Repositories.” D-Lib Magazine 16, no. 9/10. Accessed
December 2, 2013. doi:10.1045/september2010-adamick
Armbruster, Chris, and Laurent Romary. 2009.
“Comparing Repository Types: Challenges and
Barriers for Subject-Based Repositories, Research
Repositories, National Repository Systems and
Institutional Repositories in Serving Scholarly
Communication.” Accessed on December 2, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1506905
Association of Research Libraries. “About.” http://
www.arl.org/about
Larsen, Peder Olesen, and Markus von Ins. 2010.
“The Rate of Growth in Scientific Publication and the
Decline in Coverage Provided by Science Citation
Index.” Scientometrics 84, no. 3: 575–603. Accessed on
December 2, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z
Maron, Nancy L, and Sarah Pickle. 2013. Searching
for Sustainability: Strategies from Eight Digitized Special
Collections. Washington, DC: Association of Research
Libraries. http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/
publications/searching-for-sustainability-report-
nov2013.pdf
Pryor, Graham. 2012. Managing Research Data. Facet
Publishing: London.
Endnotes
1 Scholarly materials may include materials such as
pre-prints, post-prints, working papers, and data.
2 Indiana University (IU) identified the Digital
Library of the Commons (DLC), to which their
Libraries have provided technical support. IU
did not complete the survey, so the DLC is not
included as a case study.
3 http://www.eprints.org/us/
4 http://www.dspace.org/
5 http://hubzero.org/
6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
This project was made possible in part by the Institute
of Museum and Library Services grant number
LG-51-12-0511-12.
References
Adamick, Jessica, and Rebecca Reznik-Zellen.
2010. “Representation and Recognition of Subject
Repositories.” D-Lib Magazine 16, no. 9/10. Accessed
December 2, 2013. doi:10.1045/september2010-adamick
Armbruster, Chris, and Laurent Romary. 2009.
“Comparing Repository Types: Challenges and
Barriers for Subject-Based Repositories, Research
Repositories, National Repository Systems and
Institutional Repositories in Serving Scholarly
Communication.” Accessed on December 2, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1506905
Association of Research Libraries. “About.” http://
www.arl.org/about
Larsen, Peder Olesen, and Markus von Ins. 2010.
“The Rate of Growth in Scientific Publication and the
Decline in Coverage Provided by Science Citation
Index.” Scientometrics 84, no. 3: 575–603. Accessed on
December 2, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z
Maron, Nancy L, and Sarah Pickle. 2013. Searching
for Sustainability: Strategies from Eight Digitized Special
Collections. Washington, DC: Association of Research
Libraries. http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/
publications/searching-for-sustainability-report-
nov2013.pdf
Pryor, Graham. 2012. Managing Research Data. Facet
Publishing: London.
Endnotes
1 Scholarly materials may include materials such as
pre-prints, post-prints, working papers, and data.
2 Indiana University (IU) identified the Digital
Library of the Commons (DLC), to which their
Libraries have provided technical support. IU
did not complete the survey, so the DLC is not
included as a case study.
3 http://www.eprints.org/us/
4 http://www.dspace.org/
5 http://hubzero.org/
6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
This project was made possible in part by the Institute
of Museum and Library Services grant number
LG-51-12-0511-12.
