20 · Survey Results: Executive Summary
Figure 3: Advisory Board Member Composition
Figure 4: Influence of Advisory Board: 1 is no influence and 4 is large influence
9
5
4 4
3
2
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Academics Industry Government Non-­‐profit workers Other sector General public Students
3.88
3.50
3.25 3.13 3.00
2.75
1.75
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Strategic direction Sustainability Outreach Repository
policies
Collection
development
activities
Fundraising Day-to-day
workflows
Of the seven case study institutions, four are as-
sessing and two are planning to assess effectiveness.
Web use statistics and download counts are the most
widespread assessment techniques in use or being
planned. User surveys, interviews, and focus groups
have also been conducted (see Figure 5). One institu-
tion involved with six repositories does not plan to
conduct assessment.
Previous Page Next Page