SPEC Kit 347: Community-based Collections (July 2015)
Page17(17 of 184)
SPEC Kit 347: Community-based Collections · 17 SURVEY QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES The SPEC Survey on Community-based Collections was designed by Lourdes Santamaría-Wheeler, Exhibits Coordinator, Jessica Belcoure Marcetti, Volunteer Coordinator for the Panama Canal Museum Collection, Rebecca Fitzsimmons, Intake Coordinator for the Panama Canal Museum Collection, Margarita Vargas-Betancourt, Caribbean Basin Librarian, and Sophia Krzys Acord, Associate Director of the Center for the Humanities and the Public Sphere, at the University of Florida. These results are based on 55 responses from 48 of the 125 ARL member libraries (38%) by the deadline of April 6, 2015. The survey’s introductory text and questions are reproduced below, followed by the response data and selected comments from the respondents. Many libraries today are actively acquiring much more than individual papers and institutional record collections—they are also acquiring community-based collections. Community-based collections are those that have been amassed not by one individual but by a collective, which may take the form of a museum, ethnic or cultural organization, or other diaspora group active in the documentation of its past. Often these collections are emotional in that they speak to the community’s heritage and identity. As such, these broad archives are often extremely personal to those who collected, and sometimes created, the materials. In addition to more traditional roles such as caring for the physical collection, in working with community-based collections libraries are navigating new territory with the integration and stewardship of these active and directly connected communities. An ongoing commitment to community engagement, with some level of shared governance or other collaborative activity to build, process, or publicize the collection, is often a key part of acquiring community-based collections. The purpose of this survey is two-fold: to assess the breadth of practice taking place at the intersection of academic research libraries and cultural communities, and to discover what activities are being conducted by these libraries to support community groups in the collection, documentation, and stewardship of their shared heritage, including public outreach and educational initiatives relating the collection. This type of work enhances and may potentially transform the traditional service role of libraries by suggesting a greater continuity between the repository and the originator(s) of a collection. The survey results will help academic libraries evaluate the potential impacts of acquiring community-based collections. The results will also be evaluated to answer the following questions: By preserving and making accessible archival materials, how do research libraries assist partner communities in achieving their outreach and stewardship goals? How do these projects draw on new competencies and expertise for library professionals, and what strategies have libraries developed to support and evaluate this work? What models have libraries developed to collaborate in new ways with the donors and creators of archival materials, while keeping shared missions moving forward productively? Some libraries have multiple, distinct community-based collections that may be organized and/or managed differently. In order to more broadly understand the current landscape of community-based collections within ARL member libraries, we welcome separate responses from the curators or managers of as many distinct collections within an institution as wish to complete the survey. Please submit separate surveys for each community-based collection.
SPEC Kit 347: Community-based Collections (July 2015)
Page15(15 of 184)
SPEC Kit 347: Community-based Collections · 15 description of collections, as traditionally practiced by archives and repositories, to a multifocal process that includes the voices of the community. This takes a variety of collection management forms the majority of community-based collections are treated similarly to other library acquisitions, while a smaller number of libraries (~20%) are experimenting with innovative peer-to-peer forms of engagement. The low survey response rate coupled with the relatively recent acquisition of the reported collec- tions suggests that this is new territory for ARL mem- ber institutions. The generosity and intensity of the responses received on this survey point to this as an important, growing area for research libraries to watch in the near future. One can also infer from the responses that the libraries’ traditional strengths of service, preservation, and access are assets in the acquisition of community-based collections. Yet, aca- demic research libraries seem to lack widespread ex- pertise and resources in community stewardship and could benefit from looking toward similar cultural stewards outside of peer institutions. This SPEC Kit aims to provide important documentation and sup- port for conversations between libraries, archives, and other cultural entities about developing sustain- able models to preserve and support community and cultural heritage.