162 · Representative Documents: Research Guides UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY, SUNY Scholarly Metrics http://libguides.library.albany.edu/citesearch Basics - Scholarly Metrics - Library Guides at University at Albany http://libguides.library.albany.edu/citesearch[4/24/15, 3:31:38 PM] Admin Sign In Basics Conducting Your Search Cited Reference Analytics Altmetrics Author Profiles Tracking Cited References Cited references are the articles, books, and other resources listed in a bibliography, a "Works Cited" list, or in a "References" list. Cited references are useful for finding additional articles and books on a topic, for identifying the top researchers in a field, and for promotion and tenure decisions. Databases tracking cited references make it possible to follow the instances where an author has been cited. This technique may be useful to: Track the research of an individual Track the history of a research idea Locate current research based on earlier research Find out how many times and where a publication is being cited Find out who is citing a particular source Find out how a particular research topic is being used to support other research and to analyze its impact Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency Journal Reputation and Impact: publishing a paper in a journal based on disciplinary reputatation or with a high impact factor is the most well known way of getting your paper cited. But there are many other things a scholar can do to promote his or her work and make it easy for others to find. Utilize Open Access Tools: Open Access journals tend to be cited more than non open access. Deposit your paper in a repository such as Scholars Archive here on campus or a disciplinary repository. Share your detailed research data in a repository. Standarize Identifying Info: try to use Take the iLearn Workshop! Come to one of our iLearn sessions for faculty and graduate students on Maximizing your Research Impact. Academics who publish (or hope to publish) scholarly research find measuring the impact and influence of their work helps others understand its value within one’s department, institution, even throughout the discipline. In this workshop, learn how to generate unique author identifiers using ORCID and Researcher ID, and how they are used. Discover indicators such as the Journal Impact Factor, the h-index, and altmetrics, and their significance. We will also discuss issues like choosing the best journal for your research, and scholarly networking through tools such as Mendeley. The workshop length is 1 hour. The workshop is held in LI B14. See the iLearn registration page for details. Comments (0) Overview of Citation Metrics 1 of 22 ���� Comments (0) What's the Difference Between All of These Tools? Research Impact and Visibility Guide from Utrecht University Libraries Comments (0) Essential Concepts of Scholarly Metrics Altmetrics: a new form of measuring scholarly impact based on web-based and social media sources which can show influence and impact. Bibliometrics: The variety of metrics available based on cited reference data to measure scholarly output, impact, relevance and ranking. Analytics include citation count, impact factor, SNIP, h-index, e-index, and a wide variety of related measurements. Citation Analysis: the process of tracing various patterns of scholarly behavior through analyzing the cited and/or citing references of a body of work. This could be done on an individual article, author, journal, institution, or other group. Citation Count: The number of times an article, author, journal, institution, etc. has been cited. It is very difficult to locate every single time something or someone has been cited. Commonly accepted citation counts come from Web of Science. Each source which provides citation counts draws from a different base of resources and therefore the results may differ between Web of Science and Google Scholar, for example. Citation Evaluation: Simply identifying the number of times someone or something has been cited does not account for certain citation patterns. For example, an author may have one or two articles early in his or her career that have very high citation counts, but later articles have substantially fewer. Another author may have a relatively steady number of citations for each article throughout his or her career. Journal Ranking: There are a number of metrics that seek to measure the influence of a journal based on how it is being cited in other works. One such metric is the Journal Impact Factor. It should be emphasized that the ranking of a journal is not necessarily a reflection of a single specific article within the journal. Library » Library Guides » Scholarly Metrics Scholarly Metrics Tags: altmetrics, citation, citation_search, cited_references, impact_factor, journal_ranking, promotion, tenure, web_of_science This page describes the various means of searching for cited and citing references, measures of influence and impact, altmetrics and bibliometrics. Basics Print Page Search: This Guide Search UAlbany Home | Calendars & Schedules | IT Services Search Our Website Go � ���� � ���� � ���� � This Guide
160 · Representative Documents: Assessment Reports WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Standard Language for Publication Reports Content last reviewed 28 April 2015 What is the h index? The h index was proposed by J.E. Hirsch in 2005 and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283832/. The h index is a quantitative metric based on analysis of publication data using publications and citations to provide “an estimate of the importance, significance, and broad impact of a scientist’s cumulative research contributions.” According to Hirsch, the h index is defined as: "A scientist has index h if h of his or her Np papers have at least h citations each and the other (Np – h) papers have ≤h citations each.” As an example, an h index of 10 means that among all publications by one author, 10 of these publications have received at least 10 citations each. For Younger Investigators: An alternative metric to consider is the m value. The m value is a correction of the h index for time with y = number of years since the first publication: (m = h/y). According to Hirsch, m is an “indicator of the successfulness of a scientist” and can be used to compare scientists of different seniority. The m value can be seen as an indicator for “scientific quality” with the advantage (as compared to the h index) that the m value is corrected for age. Note that the h index calculation from Scopus only uses documents published after 1995. The h index varies among resources including Google Scholar depending on the publication and citation data included in the calculation of the h index.