9 SPEC Kit 353: Funding Article Processing Charges
8 Stuart Lawson, “‘Total Cost of Ownership’ of Scholarly Communication: Managing Subscription and
APC Payments Together,” Learned Publishing 28, no. 1 (2015): 10, http://doi.org/10.1087/20150103.
9 Bernhard Mittermaier, “Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access—Chimera or Reality?” ScienceOpen
Research, 2015, 10, http://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.AOWNTU.v1.
10 Rajiv Nariani and Leila Fernandez, “Open Access Publishing: What Authors Want,” College &
Research Libraries 73, no. 2 (March 2012): 187, http://doi.org/10.5860/crl-203.
11 Catherine Sharp, Institutional policies on the use of Open Access Funds: a report from the Jisc
Pathways to Open Access project, London: London’s Global University, 2015, 7, http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/
12 Rachel Gyore, Allison Reeve, Crystal Cameron-Vedros, Deborah Ludwig, and Ada Emmett, “Campus
Open Access Funds: Experiences of the KU ‘One University’ Open Access Author Fund,” Journal of
Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3, no. 1 (2015): 19, http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1252;
Heidi Zuniga and Lilian Hoffecker, “Managing an Open Access Fund: Tips from the Trenches and
Questions for the Future,” Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship 1, no. 1 (2016): 11,
13 Jonathan Nabe and Andrea Imre, “Library Funding of Open Access Publication Fees: Effects on
Faculty Behavior and Attitude,” Presentation at the American Library Association Midwinter
Meeting, ALCTS Scholarly Communications Interest Group, Chicago, IL, January 31, 2015. http://
14 David J. Solomon and Bo-Christer Björk, “Article Processing Charges for Open Access Publication—
The Situation for Research Intensive Universities in the USA and Canada,” PeerJ 4 (2016): 5, https://
15 Kingsley, “Paying for Publication: Issues and Challenges for Research Support Services,” 274.
16 Jackie Proven, LOCH Pathfinder project: St Andrews Library Open Access Fund: business case and
criteria, St. Andrews: University of St. Andrews Library, 2016, 1, https://research-repository.st-
17 Leila Fernandez and Rajiv Nariani, “Open Access Funds: A Canadian Library Survey,” Partnership:
the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 6, no. 1 (2011): 3, http://doi.
18 Najko Jahn and Marco Tullney, “A Study of Institutional Spending on Open Access Publication Fees
in Germany,” PeerJ 4 (2016): 13, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2323.
19 Jane Monson, Wendy Highby, and Bette Rathe, “Library Involvement in Faculty Publication Funds,”
College & Undergraduate Libraries 21, no. 2–3 (2014): 309, http://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.9330
20 Suenje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Robert Darby, Bettina Goerner, Jenni Hyppoelae, Peter Igo-Kemenes,
Deborah Kahn, Simon Lambert et al., “Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists
think about open access publishing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1101.5260 (2011): 9, http://arxiv.org/
abs/1101.5260; Lara, “The Library’s Role in the Management and Funding of Open Access
Publishing,” 6, http://doi.org/10.1087/20150102; Charles D. Eckman and Beth T. Weil, “Institutional
Open Access Funds: Now Is the Time,” PLOS Biology 8, no. 5 (2010): 3, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
Previous Page Next Page