SPEC Kit 335: Digital Image Collections and Services · 147
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Prioritization and Selection Criteria
http://guides.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/content.php?pid=102412&sid=770614#2484258
Selection Factors
UHM Library holds a large number of collections that would be appropriate for digitization and online access. However, digitization
projects are costly and require a commitment of staff time. The following list of criteria is recommended to guide selection of collections of
analog materials for conversion to digital format. Selection is an activity led by content managers and specialists with the help of
D-CARP.
Copyright Status
What is the copyright status of the materials? Most material considered for digitization and access on the open Web falls into one of the
following three categories:
Public domain: works that never were, or are no longer covered by copyright. Works in the public domain may be used without
permission.
All works published before January 1, 1923.
Works published between 1923 and 1964 and not renewed in the 28th year.
Works published without copyright notice before 1989.
Unpublished works whose author died before 1932 otherwise, the term is life plus 70 years.
Works for which the copyright is held by the University
Works for which we have secured permission to digitize
Significance of the Collection
Significance depends on a number of indicators, but it is always the subjective judgment of a librarian, archivist, curator, or faculty
member. The following questions may be used to establish the significance of a collection:
Will experts attest to the importance of the collection?
How does it fit into current or potential research activities?
How is the collection currently being used? How might digitization increase use of the collection
Does the intellectual quality of the source materials warrant the level of access made possible by digitization?
Will digitization enhance the intellectual value of the material?
Current and Potential Users
There is some evidence that digitization always increases use, but current use is still an important indicator:
Are users consulting the proposed source materials?
Is current access so difficult that digitization will create a new audience?
Will electronic access to these materials enhance their value to users?
Does the physical condition of the originals limit their use?
Will digitization meet the needs of local users?
Organization and Descriptive Metadata
No matter how important a collection might be, the collection must be organized and described before it is ready for digitization.
Has the collection been organized and processed?
Are there MARC records or some other form of catalogued records for the collection?
Is there a finding aid -either paper or online?
If there is no form of description by way of a finding aid, catalogued entries, etc., project planning and project costs will increase.
Relationship to Other Digital Collections
It is important to contribute to "critical mass" of digital materials in the subject whenever possible. By complementing existing online
collections, the value of your collection will enhance the subject area and, in turn, the user experience.
If published material, has it already been digitized? All? Parts of the collection?
How does this collection fit in with other digital collections? Will the whole be greater than the sum of the parts?
Are there complementary collections in other institutions?
Formats/Languages/Nature of the Materials
Some formats are more established for digitization and online delivery than others. D-CARP is best equipped to provide sustainable
access to text, photographs, other 2-D visual materials, and compressed audio. We do not currently support the online storage and
delivery of video.
Foreign-language materials require project staff who are proficient in the language(s), which may add to the difficulty of assembling the
project team. Creation of text for non-Western languages requires the creatir to enter text in this language and it may not be possible to
provide searchable text, either corrected or uncorrected.
Materials must be able to withstand the handling necessary for digitization. If the determination has been made that the items can
withstand digitization, the condition of the material will also be a factor in deciding whether to outsource digitization or perform the work
in-house.
Sources of Funding
Digitization projects are funded with internal university funds and external grant funds. The goal is to match a high-priority project with
the appropriate funding source. The best approach with regard to grant funding is to develop skeletal outlines for digitization projects for a
number of important collections and then research potential funding sources. Once a good match has been found, the details of project
planning can be finalized, bringing the project in line with funding requirements and evaluative criteria as closely as possible.
Project Description Form
Comments (0)
Powered by Springshare All rights reserved. Report a tech support issue.
View this page in a format suitable for printers and screen-readers or mobile devices.
Library Home |Research Tools |Personal Services |About the Library |Terms of Use |UH Manoa |UH System |Ask Us
8/8/13 11:13 AM
Previous Page Next Page