SPEC Kit 301: Liaison Services (October 2007)
Page11(11 of 172)
Liaison Services · 11 Executive Summary Introduction A SPEC survey on liaison services in libraries that was conducted in 1992 concluded that, “Until re- cently the library collection has formed the focus of library activity. But as the physical collection be- comes less central, the user is becoming the focus of library services. The role librarians are to have in this decentralized information environment could depend largely upon the effectiveness with which liaison librarians are able to monitor, anticipate, and respond to user’s information needs.”1 Since then many changes have taken place in libraries and in society. Electronic communication and elec- tronic publications have changed library patrons’ expectations and challenged libraries to provide access to a wide variety of materials while adjust- ing to their patrons’ constantly evolving informa- tion seeking behaviors and technological needs. Since 1992, the definition of the liaison role also has changed. The 1992 RUSA guidelines for liai- sons described the liaison role as primarily to gath- er information for collection development.2 The 2001 guidelines have an expanded definition of liaison work that includes five components. Three components stress collection development and two emphasize purposes beyond collection develop- ment, namely public relations and communicating clientele needs to the library staff and governing body.3 Now, librarians are taking on a number of new roles and responsibilities including partnering with faculty in the classroom, acting as academic advisors and mentors, and providing computer software and hardware support. Background This survey sought to identify the current roles of liaisons in ARL libraries and any changes in focus in their interactions with academic departments. It explored whether liaisons are being reactive to faculty and student needs, partners in providing teaching/library instruction, pioneers in the new electronic world or have limited involvement with the academic departments, and documented how libraries mix the activities of traditional liaison re- sponsibilities with the new trends that are fostered by the evolving needs of today’s library patrons. The survey was distributed to the 123 ARL mem- ber libraries in May 2007. Sixty-six libraries—63 academic and 3 non-academic—responded by the deadline for a 54% response rate. Only one of the academic libraries does not provide liaison services to academic departments in their university these services are not applicable to the non-academic libraries. Twenty-nine of the responding libraries (49%) began offering liaison services before 1980. A number of respondents couldn’t provide an ex- act start date but made comments along the lines of, “as long as the library has been in existence” and “for decades.” Those who could provide a date show that a wave of new, or newly defined, pro- grams has started each decade from the 1960s to today the most recent program started in 2007.