Footnotes · 119
Footnotes
Footnotes may also include errata and corrections to data from prior years not previously reported. Numbers refer to
columns in Library Data Tables and to Questionnaire numbers. Unless otherwise stated all figures are as of 06/30/2010.
Question
Number
Footnote
ALABAMA
All figures are as of 09/30/2010.
Library branches included: Gorgas Library (Main), Social Work Reading Room, Hoole Special Collections, Communications Reading
Room, Map Library, Bruno Business Library, Rodgers Science &Engineering Library, and McClure Education Library.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 3,397,286.
1.b.i 73,578 unique e-books added in 2009-2010.
3 79,200 e-books included in monographic volumes purchased.
5 Deduplicated using best practices procedures distributed by ARL for Serials Solutions. Deduplicated using ISSNs and other IDs as
described in best practices document. 38,077 serials had no ISSNs.
5.b.i,
5.b.ii
Separate numbers of consortial and freely available not available.
16.c These onetime expenditures are related to the acquisition of the Williams Collection.
16.d Includes Center for Research Libraries membership.
20 Includes bibliographic utilities, memberships (except CRL), and literature searching.
ALBERTA
All figures are as of 03/31/2010.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
16-26 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16a) $7,297,206 (16b) $12,423,987 (16c) 0 (16d) $806,423 (16) $20,527,616 (17) $52,823 (18a)
$8,027,915 (18b) $10,711,362 (18c) $981,413 (18) $19,720,690 (20) $7,296,859 (21) $47,597,988 (22) $4,854,398 (23) $9,751,356 (24a) 0 (24b) 0
(25) 0 (26) 0.
ARIZONA
Library branches included: Science Engineering, Fine Arts.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 5,918,898. Includes an increase of 116,071 volumes from the addition of large digital monographic
files.
ARIZONA STATE
Library branches included: ASU Tempe, ASU West, ASU Polytechnic, ASU Downtown Phoenix, and Law Library.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 4,461,231. For 2008-2009, figure reported in question 1.a. was for June 2007 instead of June 2008, so
volumes held June 30, 2009 was also incorrect. Question 1.a. 2009-2010 corrects this error. Corrected figure for June 2008 is 4,354,164.
1.b.ii Increased withdrawals due to ASU West weeding project &correction for e-book collections previously counted but which do not yet
have individual title-level catalog records.
2 Includes all ASU Libraries, including Law.
3 Decreases in ASU West, Polytechnic and Downtown Phoenix campuses due to increased site-licensing of e-books.
5.a.ii Decrease due to continued conversions from print and print+online to online only
5.b.ii Increase reflects the fact that DOAJ and PubMed Central deduped titles rose by 1,265 between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010.
9 Add 315 to 2008-2009 since it is for Access Services Reserves which was not included last year.
16.a Approval, blanket order, and firm order expenditures severely restricted in 2008-2009 but resumed in 2009-2010.
Footnotes
Footnotes may also include errata and corrections to data from prior years not previously reported. Numbers refer to
columns in Library Data Tables and to Questionnaire numbers. Unless otherwise stated all figures are as of 06/30/2010.
Question
Number
Footnote
ALABAMA
All figures are as of 09/30/2010.
Library branches included: Gorgas Library (Main), Social Work Reading Room, Hoole Special Collections, Communications Reading
Room, Map Library, Bruno Business Library, Rodgers Science &Engineering Library, and McClure Education Library.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 3,397,286.
1.b.i 73,578 unique e-books added in 2009-2010.
3 79,200 e-books included in monographic volumes purchased.
5 Deduplicated using best practices procedures distributed by ARL for Serials Solutions. Deduplicated using ISSNs and other IDs as
described in best practices document. 38,077 serials had no ISSNs.
5.b.i,
5.b.ii
Separate numbers of consortial and freely available not available.
16.c These onetime expenditures are related to the acquisition of the Williams Collection.
16.d Includes Center for Research Libraries membership.
20 Includes bibliographic utilities, memberships (except CRL), and literature searching.
ALBERTA
All figures are as of 03/31/2010.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
16-26 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16a) $7,297,206 (16b) $12,423,987 (16c) 0 (16d) $806,423 (16) $20,527,616 (17) $52,823 (18a)
$8,027,915 (18b) $10,711,362 (18c) $981,413 (18) $19,720,690 (20) $7,296,859 (21) $47,597,988 (22) $4,854,398 (23) $9,751,356 (24a) 0 (24b) 0
(25) 0 (26) 0.
ARIZONA
Library branches included: Science Engineering, Fine Arts.
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are also included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 5,918,898. Includes an increase of 116,071 volumes from the addition of large digital monographic
files.
ARIZONA STATE
Library branches included: ASU Tempe, ASU West, ASU Polytechnic, ASU Downtown Phoenix, and Law Library.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2009 revised to 4,461,231. For 2008-2009, figure reported in question 1.a. was for June 2007 instead of June 2008, so
volumes held June 30, 2009 was also incorrect. Question 1.a. 2009-2010 corrects this error. Corrected figure for June 2008 is 4,354,164.
1.b.ii Increased withdrawals due to ASU West weeding project &correction for e-book collections previously counted but which do not yet
have individual title-level catalog records.
2 Includes all ASU Libraries, including Law.
3 Decreases in ASU West, Polytechnic and Downtown Phoenix campuses due to increased site-licensing of e-books.
5.a.ii Decrease due to continued conversions from print and print+online to online only
5.b.ii Increase reflects the fact that DOAJ and PubMed Central deduped titles rose by 1,265 between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010.
9 Add 315 to 2008-2009 since it is for Access Services Reserves which was not included last year.
16.a Approval, blanket order, and firm order expenditures severely restricted in 2008-2009 but resumed in 2009-2010.
