SPEC Kit 341: Digital Collections Assessment and Outreach (August 2014)
Page84(84 of 198)
84 · Representative Documents: Digital Collections Homepages WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY WSU Libraries Digital Collections http://content.libraries.wsu.edu/ Digital Collections Home Browse All Collections Help Search Search Advanced Search Photographs [More +] Charles Pratsch Collection The Grays Harbor region that Pratsch photographed between 1888 and 1913 may best be described as a small collection of recently formed company towns owned by timber and rail interests (Pope &Talbot Company and Northern Pacific). Maps [More +] Early Washington Maps: A Digital Collection More than 925 historic maps with links to high-resolution MrSID files built in collaboration with WSU Manuscripts, Archives, and Special Collections and the University of Washington Libraries. Media &Documents [More +] Civil Rights Oral History Interviews In February of 2001, the Spokesman-Review produced a month long series of articles on black history titled "Through Spokane's Eyes Moments in Black History," focusing in particular on the civil rights movement of the 1960s. As part of that series, Rebecca Nappi conducted a series of interviews with individuals with ties to both the civil rights movement and to Spokane. Individual Items [More +] Scrapbook: Taiwan Under Japanese Occupation A single volume scrapbook of 80 images taken during travels in Taiwan in 1935. Photographs include photographs lumbering, fishing, sugar- refining, public works, shrines, and villages. Regional &WSU history [More +] Catherine May Bedell Congressional Papers The papers of Catherine May Bedell, United States Representative from the Fourth Congressional District of Washington, 1959-1970. Native American History [More +] Lucullus V. McWhorter Photograph Collection 185 photographs from the Collection of Lucullus V. McWhorter. The images include portraits of prominent Nez Perce warriors and battlefield sites from the 1877 Nez Perce war. Back to top Digital Collections Home |Contact Us Powered by CONTENTdm® WSU Libraries Digital Collections Find Journal Articles My Accounts New Collections: http://content.libraries.wsu.edu/
SPEC Kit 341: Digital Collections Assessment and Outreach (August 2014)
Page86(86 of 198)
86 · Representative Documents: Digital Project Selection Criteria UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Criteria for Evaluating Proposals to Produce, Curate, or Preserve Digital Content http://www.library.umass.edu/about-the-libraries/library-policies-procedures-and-guidelines/criteria-for- evaluating-digital-proposals/ Criteria for Evaluating Proposals to Produce, Curate, or Preserve Digital Content -UMass Amherst Library http://www.library.umass.edu/about-the-libraries/library-policies-procedures-and-guidelines/criteria-for-evaluating-digital-proposals/[7/9/14 5:13:15 PM] UMass Amherst Site Search Project Title: Submitted By: Collaborator: Date: Fit with Library/University Fits into the mission and strategic goals of the Libraries and University (please specify). Aligns with the Libraries’ Collection Development Policy. Increases library visibility on the UMass campus. Increases national or international visibility for UMass. Significance of the Project Project has product of academic value or community significance. Collecting and preserving the material will enhance the intellectual value of the material. Complements existing collection strengths or fills gap in existing virtual collection. Contributes to the development of critical subject mass of digital materials in areas of strong demand. Content is unique, rare, or difficult to access. Results in a reduction in handling of fragile material, or protects materials at high risk of theft or mutilation, or addresses material that is deteriorating. Incorporates value-added services that enhance usability (e.g., through new search capabilities, integration of formats, links to other materials, the ability to manipulate images and texts, or study materials in new ways). Reduces costs and/or generates efficiencies (e.g., by eliminating the need to acquire resources, freeing up staff time, etc.). The Libraries participation contributes to compliance with funder requirements. Enhances access to materials previously unavailable to the public. Other (please specify). Source Materials and Metadata The Libraries have access to all the source materials required to execute the project. The project has been organized and processed (please specify). Is there existing metadata? Yes/No Is there a finding aid? Yes/No Structured content and/or value standards were used to create the metadata. The source materials will produce good quality digital output. Resources and Technical Considerations The Libraries have the technical infrastructure to support the project. The Libraries have the knowledge and skills necessary to accomplish the project alone or with a partner, or capacity to develop them. There are other librarians, archivists and/or faculty who would be willing to partner on the project. About the Libraries » Library Policies, Procedures, and Guidelines » Criteria for Evaluating Proposals to Produce, Curate, or Preserve Digital Content Criteria for Evaluating Proposals to Produce, Curate, or Preserve Digital Content University of Massachusetts Amherst Criteria for Evaluating Proposals to Produce, Curate, or Preserve Digital Content Version 1.4, April 2, 2013 The Libraries welcomes proposals for projects involving the production, stewardship, and/or preservation of digital content. Consideration will be given to projects that relate to the scholarly activities of members of the University community and that can be made available to the widest possible audience. Projects should have a discrete digital product(s) of academic value or community significance. The following criteria are intended to help reviewers, potential partners, and content managers evaluate the viability of proposed digital projects. Criteria in bold are required for approving a digital project proposal normal items are for consideration. In addition, copyright and intellectual property considerations may affect our ability to preserve and provide access to digital content. The value of the anticipated product should justify the effort expended to develop it. For digitization projects: The condition of the materials will be considered. Digitization may serve either a preservation or access need and most projects address both of these aspects. Digitization may protect fragile items, but they must be able to withstand handling necessary for digitization. For born digital content: The format of project materials will not restrict consideration. Related files: Digital Project Proposal Form Collection Development Policy Approved by SMG: April 10, 2013 Services About the Libraries Research Collections Search Tools