Footnotes · 133
FLORIDA STATE, cont.
12 The 2010-2011 number includes previously uncounted graphic materials in Special Collections, including a substantial university
photographic and negatives collection.
16, 16.a The Libraries' received federal stimulus dollars which were primarily spent in arts and humanities monographs.
16, 16.b, c There are 2 reasons for the jump in this number. 1) Some are federal stimulus funds. 2) The budget code reporting system has
been adjusted.
16, 16.d Some memberships were canceled for budget savings.
18.c Federal stimulus dollars were used to hire student workers for new projects and to supplement empty full-time lines.
21 The increase due to more accurate reporting of library expenditures and due to federal stimulus funds.
22 One-time stimulus money were used to purchase database backfiles.
24.a FCLA paid membership fees previously paid directly by the Library.
24.b FCLA funds were not reported in 2009-2010. In 2010-2011, we are reporting them.
25 The increase in computer hardware and software expenditures is due to the creation of a campus student technology fee giving
us a sustained, new source of technology funds.
27.c Federal stimulus dollars were used to hire student workers for new projects and to supplement empty full-time lines.
28 Consolidated service points in Strozier and Dirac Libraries.
29 The increase is due to the 24/7 virtual reference service we offer.
30-31 The rise in classes and participants were due to significant, targeted outreach initiatives and the opening of the new Learning
Commons, which increased awareness of library instruction.
32 FSU libraries opened a new Learning Commons with associated new services and resources.
33 Consistent with the national trend, we continue to see declines in the circulation in our general collection while use of electronic
materials and loans in specialty collections (media and technology) are rising.
34 Due to an increase of library staff-mediated overdue renewals for faculty, which are recorded by our system as initial circulations,
the number of renewals is undercounted. This also drives up our number for initial circulations. The reality is that these numbers
are probably closer to each other in value that is displayed here.
35 A reorganization of ILL permitted staff with the best experience to be matched to the appropriate tasks. Moreover, since ILL have
been relocated to the building with the collection, student workers are no longer depended on to locate the books.
37 There were increases in doctoral graduation across colleges, in particular Arts &Sciences and Education.
38 Number of degree programs source for the 2009-2010 number was from IPEDS. The 2010-2011 number was taken from FSU's
Degree Program Inventory (DPI). From that inventory, the percentage change is minimal if comparing the most recent two years
at FSU with the 2010-11 current number. 2010-2011 figure =77, as compared to 75 doctoral programs for 2009-2010, and 74 doctoral
programs for 2008-2009.
42 The 2010-2011 number excluded law and medical and was not taken from IPEDS data. If taken from FSU IR data set from 2009,
the number would have been 4,759, resulting in 0% change from the 2010-2011 figure, 4,741. Instead, the 2009-2010 IPEDS data
included GRAD and Professional degrees, which should not have been reported.
43 The 2009-2010 IPEDS number included professional and graduate programs. If FSU's IR data were included with law and medical
separated out, the 2009-2010 figure would have been 2,586, and the percent change when compared to 2,523 (the 2010-2011 figure)
would have been 2%.
GEORGE WASHINGTON
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2010 revised to 2,352,115.
8 We ordered more titles in 2010-2011 than in 2009-2010.
11 2009-2010 figure revised to 18,943.
16.c We collected fewer fines and photocopying fees than in 2009-2010.
FLORIDA STATE, cont.
12 The 2010-2011 number includes previously uncounted graphic materials in Special Collections, including a substantial university
photographic and negatives collection.
16, 16.a The Libraries' received federal stimulus dollars which were primarily spent in arts and humanities monographs.
16, 16.b, c There are 2 reasons for the jump in this number. 1) Some are federal stimulus funds. 2) The budget code reporting system has
been adjusted.
16, 16.d Some memberships were canceled for budget savings.
18.c Federal stimulus dollars were used to hire student workers for new projects and to supplement empty full-time lines.
21 The increase due to more accurate reporting of library expenditures and due to federal stimulus funds.
22 One-time stimulus money were used to purchase database backfiles.
24.a FCLA paid membership fees previously paid directly by the Library.
24.b FCLA funds were not reported in 2009-2010. In 2010-2011, we are reporting them.
25 The increase in computer hardware and software expenditures is due to the creation of a campus student technology fee giving
us a sustained, new source of technology funds.
27.c Federal stimulus dollars were used to hire student workers for new projects and to supplement empty full-time lines.
28 Consolidated service points in Strozier and Dirac Libraries.
29 The increase is due to the 24/7 virtual reference service we offer.
30-31 The rise in classes and participants were due to significant, targeted outreach initiatives and the opening of the new Learning
Commons, which increased awareness of library instruction.
32 FSU libraries opened a new Learning Commons with associated new services and resources.
33 Consistent with the national trend, we continue to see declines in the circulation in our general collection while use of electronic
materials and loans in specialty collections (media and technology) are rising.
34 Due to an increase of library staff-mediated overdue renewals for faculty, which are recorded by our system as initial circulations,
the number of renewals is undercounted. This also drives up our number for initial circulations. The reality is that these numbers
are probably closer to each other in value that is displayed here.
35 A reorganization of ILL permitted staff with the best experience to be matched to the appropriate tasks. Moreover, since ILL have
been relocated to the building with the collection, student workers are no longer depended on to locate the books.
37 There were increases in doctoral graduation across colleges, in particular Arts &Sciences and Education.
38 Number of degree programs source for the 2009-2010 number was from IPEDS. The 2010-2011 number was taken from FSU's
Degree Program Inventory (DPI). From that inventory, the percentage change is minimal if comparing the most recent two years
at FSU with the 2010-11 current number. 2010-2011 figure =77, as compared to 75 doctoral programs for 2009-2010, and 74 doctoral
programs for 2008-2009.
42 The 2010-2011 number excluded law and medical and was not taken from IPEDS data. If taken from FSU IR data set from 2009,
the number would have been 4,759, resulting in 0% change from the 2010-2011 figure, 4,741. Instead, the 2009-2010 IPEDS data
included GRAD and Professional degrees, which should not have been reported.
43 The 2009-2010 IPEDS number included professional and graduate programs. If FSU's IR data were included with law and medical
separated out, the 2009-2010 figure would have been 2,586, and the percent change when compared to 2,523 (the 2010-2011 figure)
would have been 2%.
GEORGE WASHINGTON
Data from the Law and Health Sciences Library are included in the figures reported.
1.a Volumes held June 30, 2010 revised to 2,352,115.
8 We ordered more titles in 2010-2011 than in 2009-2010.
11 2009-2010 figure revised to 18,943.
16.c We collected fewer fines and photocopying fees than in 2009-2010.
