DECEMBER 2012 RESEARCH LIBRARY ISSUES: A QUARTERLY REPORT FROM ARL, CNI, AND SPARC
23 “Settlement between Penn State University and National Federation of the Blind,” Pennsylvania
State University, http://accessibility.psu.edu/nfbpsusettlement.
24 “Joint ‘Dear Colleague’ Letter: Electronic Book Readers,” DOJ and ED to College or University
President, June 29, 2010, http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-20100629.html.
27 “Electronic Book Reader Dear Colleague Letter: Questions and Answers about the Law, the
Technology, and the Population Affected,” Office for Civil Rights, US Department of Education,
28 Letter from Marc Maurer to Messrs. Lambert, Levitan, Waterhouse, and Dr. Oblinger, Sept. 12, 2012,
29 Letter from H. David Lambert and Diana G. Oblinger to Marc Maurer, Sept. 17, 2012, http://net.
30 Report of the Commission on Accessible Instructional Materials in Postsecondary Education for
Students with Disabilities (Washington, DC: The Commission, Dec. 2011), http://aim.cast.org/
31 The Chafee Amendment is named after Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island, who long championed
the rights of the print disabled. For the text of the amendment, see http://www.copyright.gov/
32 The Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, No. 11-CV-6351 (HB), slip op. at 22-23 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2012).
33 More information on these organizations can be found at: http://www.loc.gov/nls/; http://www.
learningally.org/; http://nfb.org/libraries-for-the-blind; https://www.bookshare.org/; http://www.
34 17 U.S.C. § 110(8), http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#110.
35 17 U.S.C. § 107, http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107.
36 Association of Research Libraries; Center for Social Media, School of Communication, American
University; Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, Washington College of Law,
American University; Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries (Washington,
DC: ARL, Jan. 2012), http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/codefairuse/index.shtml.
37 HathiTrust at 22.
38 Page 1, Defendant Intervenors’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.