SPEC Kit 310: Author Addenda · 41
Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3
Presentations to graduate student
organizations including question and
answer session.
Presentations to faculty including
question and answer session.
Providing brochures/handouts in
response to specific questions at
informational session or to individuals
with questions.
Self playing PowerPoint tutorial on
author’s rights.
Public event featuring Kenneth Crews
of Columbia entitled Who Owns Your
Scholarship? for which attendees earned
Responsible Conduct of Research
continuing education credit.
Brochure on author’s rights, which will
soon be posted to the ACRL scholarly
communication program development
site as a template for others to adapt.
The veterinary librarian says that the
most effective activity is when faculty
become outraged because publishers
won’t permit them to use their own work
for classroom teaching and derivative
works.
One-to-one contacts in the context of the
scholarly publishing context overall have
been effective.
Planning for the institutional repository
has raised faculty awareness about
intellectual property issues.
Visits to faculty department meetings to
discuss issues.
One-on-one conversations with faculty. One-on-one conversations, and
workshops, with graduate students.
We have held several workshops at
medical and main locations at medical
campus, more direct faculty contacts
were made.
Workshops at main campus were
conducted using a video recording/
streaming technology to enable remote
users to view.
We routinely host speakers and
have organized forums on scholarly
communication issues, including
addenda.
We’ve met with the Vice Provost for
Research and research administrators to
develop effective policies and activities
related to author addenda and other
scholarly communication policies.
The author addendum FAQ is an effective
resource for answering questions by
faculty who seek to comply with the NIH
Public Access Policy.
When faculty consult one-on-one with a
librarian about a publishing agreements,
they are steered towards author
addenda.
Presentations at formal and informal
department events like faculty meetings
and coffee hours have been very effective
in getting the word out about author
rights.
Working with General Counsel to
educate ourselves.
Accurate and easy to navigate Web site. Small group presentations.
Working with research compliance office. Presentation at new faculty orientation. Talking with individual authors.
Workshops on managing your
copyrights.
Individual contacts with faculty. E-mail responses to questions.
Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3
Presentations to graduate student
organizations including question and
answer session.
Presentations to faculty including
question and answer session.
Providing brochures/handouts in
response to specific questions at
informational session or to individuals
with questions.
Self playing PowerPoint tutorial on
author’s rights.
Public event featuring Kenneth Crews
of Columbia entitled Who Owns Your
Scholarship? for which attendees earned
Responsible Conduct of Research
continuing education credit.
Brochure on author’s rights, which will
soon be posted to the ACRL scholarly
communication program development
site as a template for others to adapt.
The veterinary librarian says that the
most effective activity is when faculty
become outraged because publishers
won’t permit them to use their own work
for classroom teaching and derivative
works.
One-to-one contacts in the context of the
scholarly publishing context overall have
been effective.
Planning for the institutional repository
has raised faculty awareness about
intellectual property issues.
Visits to faculty department meetings to
discuss issues.
One-on-one conversations with faculty. One-on-one conversations, and
workshops, with graduate students.
We have held several workshops at
medical and main locations at medical
campus, more direct faculty contacts
were made.
Workshops at main campus were
conducted using a video recording/
streaming technology to enable remote
users to view.
We routinely host speakers and
have organized forums on scholarly
communication issues, including
addenda.
We’ve met with the Vice Provost for
Research and research administrators to
develop effective policies and activities
related to author addenda and other
scholarly communication policies.
The author addendum FAQ is an effective
resource for answering questions by
faculty who seek to comply with the NIH
Public Access Policy.
When faculty consult one-on-one with a
librarian about a publishing agreements,
they are steered towards author
addenda.
Presentations at formal and informal
department events like faculty meetings
and coffee hours have been very effective
in getting the word out about author
rights.
Working with General Counsel to
educate ourselves.
Accurate and easy to navigate Web site. Small group presentations.
Working with research compliance office. Presentation at new faculty orientation. Talking with individual authors.
Workshops on managing your
copyrights.
Individual contacts with faculty. E-mail responses to questions.
