SPEC Kit 310: Author Addenda · 25
Law School has promoted their addendum.
See UC Office of Scholarly Communication — http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/— and The UCLA Library
Scholarly Communication —- http://staff.library.ucla.edu/scholarlycommunication/
UC System.
The university consulted with legal counsel to develop an addenda specific to the requirements of the NIH open
access mandate. See http://www.hmc.psu.edu/library/PMC/amendment.pdf
University of Kansas’ copyright contract language Boston Library Consortium’s Agreement to Extend Author Rights
(based on MIT’s).
Please specify other endorsing entity and the corresponding addendum. N=7
Institution-specific addendum
General Counsel.
The institution-specific addendum is explicitly endorsed by the University Office of the General Counsel. The
Libraries’ University Library Committee is the advisory committee to the Dean, the University Libraries, and the
Library and Information Science Program and is comprised of representatives of the University’s faculty, students,
and staff. The ULC has endorsed the institute-specific agenda and through its Web page issued a “challenge [to]
their faculty colleagues to take action on the matter of copyright.” See http://www.lib.wayne.edu/geninfo/units/las/
dean/ulc/.
NRC Legal Services (original mandate came from the NRC Senior Executive Committee).
Science Commons
The Library has promoted the use of the Scholar’s Copyright Addendum Engine from Science Commons.
SPARC addendum
General Counsel.
University licensing office/counsel.
Funding agency-specific addendum
The Vice President for Research approached the University Libraries for help in gathering information about the
NIH mandate. The Libraries developed a Web site and conducted training at the main campus and at the medical
campus.
Law School has promoted their addendum.
See UC Office of Scholarly Communication — http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/— and The UCLA Library
Scholarly Communication —- http://staff.library.ucla.edu/scholarlycommunication/
UC System.
The university consulted with legal counsel to develop an addenda specific to the requirements of the NIH open
access mandate. See http://www.hmc.psu.edu/library/PMC/amendment.pdf
University of Kansas’ copyright contract language Boston Library Consortium’s Agreement to Extend Author Rights
(based on MIT’s).
Please specify other endorsing entity and the corresponding addendum. N=7
Institution-specific addendum
General Counsel.
The institution-specific addendum is explicitly endorsed by the University Office of the General Counsel. The
Libraries’ University Library Committee is the advisory committee to the Dean, the University Libraries, and the
Library and Information Science Program and is comprised of representatives of the University’s faculty, students,
and staff. The ULC has endorsed the institute-specific agenda and through its Web page issued a “challenge [to]
their faculty colleagues to take action on the matter of copyright.” See http://www.lib.wayne.edu/geninfo/units/las/
dean/ulc/.
NRC Legal Services (original mandate came from the NRC Senior Executive Committee).
Science Commons
The Library has promoted the use of the Scholar’s Copyright Addendum Engine from Science Commons.
SPARC addendum
General Counsel.
University licensing office/counsel.
Funding agency-specific addendum
The Vice President for Research approached the University Libraries for help in gathering information about the
NIH mandate. The Libraries developed a Web site and conducted training at the main campus and at the medical
campus.
