ARL Academic Health Sciences Library Statistics 2014-2015
Page40(46 of 64)
40 Footnotes 2014–2015 ARL Health Sciences Library Statistics Footnotes Footnotes may also include errata and corrections to data from prior years not previously reported. Numbers refer to columns in Library Data Tables and to Questionnaire numbers. Unless otherwise stated all figures are as of 6/30/2015. Question Number Footnote ALABAMA All figures are as of 09/30/2015. 8 Health Sciences has unfilled vacancies for staff positions. 16 Ongoing vacancies impacted reference. 18–19 Did not report. ARIZONA Library branches included: Arizona Health Sciences Library on the Phoenix Biomedical Campus. 10 The average for Appointed/Faculty and Classified Staff is 38.2%. 18–20 No data available. BOSTON 17 FY 2014 inadvertently included renewals. The correct number is 2,022 for FY 2014. 18, 20 Included with Main Library response. 19 Some duplicate counting with Main library has been eliminated for FY 2015. CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 4 Electronic Books count is included with Main Library. 7.c Collection Support Expenditures are included with Other Operating Expenditures. 12 Consortia expenditures are included with Main Library. CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Library branches included: Health Sciences Library. CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 10 Major components of the UCLA employee benefit expenditures include the following: OASDI, Medicare, health insurance, life insurance, non-industrial disability insurance, workers compensation, unemployment insurance, dental insurance, vision insurance, vacation accruals, and retirement contributions. 11 Not applicable at UCLA. Actual employee benefit expenditures are based on individually calculated and recorded benefit expenditures by type of employee benefit expense. 16 The decrease for the number of reference transactions can be contributed to several factors, which at this time we can’t single out any one of these. We updated our library website, making it easier for users to locate what they need. We handle more in-depth research sessions we track the amount of time spent with the researcher and this has increased significantly, decreasing the number of actual reference transactions. We updated our tracking for SIA (Summary of Instructional Activities) interactions more comprehensively and can be inclusive with the reference transaction. We are transitioning to a new access services model and it can be that staff are not tracking each of their interactions correctly as they are learning the new model.