24 Association of Research Libraries Research Library Issues 293 2018 6, 2018, http://www.wetmachine.com/tales-of-the-sausage-factory/ can-the-states-really-pass-their-own-net-neutrality-laws-heres- why-i-think-yes/. See also State of Montana, “Fact Sheet: Why Isn’t Montana’s Executive Order Preempted?,” accessed April 17, 2018, http://governor.mt.gov/Portals/16/docs/2018/For%20Circulation%20 -%20Preemption%20High%20Level.pdf?ver=2018-01-24-151114-170. (“Even if Montana did compel ISPs through a state law, the FCC’s claims to preemption are a stretch. Preemption is a question of congressional intent. There’s no statutory basis for preemption under Title I. Remember: the FCC felt it needed to reclassify broadband under Title II to protect net neutrality principles. So when the FCC retreated back to Title I in December, it’s unclear how the FCC can simultaneously claim it doesn’t have the power to impose net neutrality principles under Title I yet preempt states from doing the same.”) 7 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), The Public Internet Option: How Local Governments Can Provide Network Neutrality, Privacy, and Access for All (New York: ACLU, March 2018), https://www.aclu.org/ report/public-internet-option. 8 See Sascha Meinrath and Nathalia Foditsch, “How Other Countries Deal with Net Neutrality,” Smithsonian Magazine, December 15, 2017, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/ how-other-countries-deal-net-neutrality-180967558/. © 2018 Krista L. Cox This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Previous Page Next Page

Research Library Issues, no. 293 (2018) resources

Free Attachments

Extracted Text (may have errors)

24 Association of Research Libraries Research Library Issues 293 2018 6, 2018, http://www.wetmachine.com/tales-of-the-sausage-factory/ can-the-states-really-pass-their-own-net-neutrality-laws-heres- why-i-think-yes/. See also State of Montana, “Fact Sheet: Why Isn’t Montana’s Executive Order Preempted?,” accessed April 17, 2018, http://governor.mt.gov/Portals/16/docs/2018/For%20Circulation%20 -%20Preemption%20High%20Level.pdf?ver=2018-01-24-151114-170. (“Even if Montana did compel ISPs through a state law, the FCC’s claims to preemption are a stretch. Preemption is a question of congressional intent. There’s no statutory basis for preemption under Title I. Remember: the FCC felt it needed to reclassify broadband under Title II to protect net neutrality principles. So when the FCC retreated back to Title I in December, it’s unclear how the FCC can simultaneously claim it doesn’t have the power to impose net neutrality principles under Title I yet preempt states from doing the same.”) 7 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), The Public Internet Option: How Local Governments Can Provide Network Neutrality, Privacy, and Access for All (New York: ACLU, March 2018), https://www.aclu.org/ report/public-internet-option. 8 See Sascha Meinrath and Nathalia Foditsch, “How Other Countries Deal with Net Neutrality,” Smithsonian Magazine, December 15, 2017, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/ how-other-countries-deal-net-neutrality-180967558/. © 2018 Krista L. Cox This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Help

loading